THE Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Dr  Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, has said that state governors entered into an  agreement with the Federal Government on the removal of the fuel  subsidy. 
In her reaction to criticisms that she was solely responsible for the  hike in the price of petrol, Okonjo-Iweala stated that the state  governors were equally in support of the subsidy removal, adding that  the decision was not taken by the Federal Government only.
Speaking on ‘Matters Arising,’ a programme of the Africa Independent  Television (AIT) on Tuesday, the Finance Minister, while articulating  that the benefits from removal of the fuel subsidy far outweighed the  present hardship the people are facing, stated that she was not  responsible for the removal of the subsidy, as many people had claimed,  adding that the decision was even taken six months before she joined the  administration of President Goodluck Jonathan.
“I was not there six months ago, when the state governors deliberated  and agreed on the removal of fuel subsidy. Most of the governors then  were aware. So, it would be unfair to say that I am solely responsible  for this. What of the governors?” she said, adding that, “I am sure it  is the people who don’t want me here in the first place that are  spreading this false information around.”
Dr Okonjo-Iweala, therefore, tasked Nigerians to be fair and  objective in their criticisms, as far as the removal of the fuel subsidy  is concerned, insisting that the decision to remove fuel subsidy, as  claimed in many quarters, was not determined by her alone.
While pleading that the people should try to understand the  initiative of the government, which is geared towards a sustainable  economic development, Dr Okonjo-Iweala further reiterated the resolve of  the Federal Government not to deliberately inflict hardship on the  people, saying that with the removal of the fuel subsidy, Nigerians  stood a better chance of improved living conditions, more job  opportunities, functional refineries, among other services.
The finance minister identified with the pains of the people, saying  that “the fuel price would not remain high forever.” She added that  “this is a tough decision for any government to take. Ghana also took  the decision recently. We know it is not an easy decision for the  Federal Government, but it is a decision for the good of the people.
“This money will be used to improve delivery of services for the  people. Let us put the money into areas that will facilitate production,  such as provision of power supply, providing state-of-the-art  hospitals, especially to curb the maternal mortality rate. Government  would invest heavily in refineries, which will be sustained by private  investors, as well as hydro power projects. This, including others,  would create more jobs for our people,” she said.
While commenting further, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) governor,  Mallam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, also harped on the need for the people to  understand the sincere motives of the government, insisting that the  removal of the subsidy is indeed a necessary step out of an impending  economic collapse, hence the government’s decision to remove the  subsidy.  He added that the removal of the fuel subsidy was a collective  decision by stakeholders such as the National Executive Council (NEC),  the state governors, among others.
Speaking on the reason the government introduced palliative measures  after the removal of the fuel subsidy, the CBN governor said, “removing  the subsidy is a necessary course to address the root cause of poverty  in the nation. Palliatives would not solve the problem. We do understand  how Nigerians feel. They should also try to understand us. Let us not  forget that the increase of fuel subsidy is not a new development. It  occurred during General Ibrahim Babandiga’s regime, Obasanjo’s regime,  both as a military head of state and democratic president.”
While lamenting the economic situation of the country, the CBN  governor expressed displeasure that the nation’s manufacturing capacity  is less than five per cent, while Nigeria imports most of the goods it  consumes. “We import rice. We import milk and package it here. We import  wheat. The country’s economy cannot be sustained with this,” adding  that the Federal Government’s policy on fuel subsidy removal would not  only help to revive the already failing economy, but would also provide  the necessary platform for the improvement of the living standard of the  Nigerian masses.
Meanwhile, the Federal Government is said to be weighing several  options in relation to some of the state governors who have been linked  with secretly sponsoring anti-subsidy removal protests in their states.
Sources in the administration confirmed, on Tuesday, that government  had earlier received reports indicating that some governors, especially  in some southern states have been linked with the sponsorship of  anti-subsidy protests.
“What happened is that indigenes of some of those states were  indifferent to the removal of fuel subsidy in the very first week. And  in order to galvanise protests, some government persons were seen to  have mobilised the sporadic protests witnessed last week,” a source  said, adding that politicians in the states had actually hijacked the  labour-induced protests which started on Monday for personal gains.
According to sources, “reports reaching the Federal Government  indicated that some state governors have decided to play politics with  the subsidy removal and turn around from what was decided at the  National Economic Council (NEC).
Another source said that the strike by labour was becoming suspicious  because the same organised labour had refused to go on strike to defend  the rights of the people of far North, South-East and South-South who  have been buying fuel at prices far above the pump price.
“The people of the North-East and North-West have been buying fuel at  N250 per litre, the same for people of the South-South, while the  people of the South-East have been buying fuel at N120 per litre. It is  not on record that labour went on strike to defend the rights of the  people of those areas,” the source said.
Meanwhile, the Federal Government has said that  the International  Monetary Fund (IMF)/World Bank did not instruct or direct it to withdraw  fuel subsidy, the Minister of Labour and Productivity, Chief  Chukwuemeka Wogu, said in Abuja, on Tuesday.
He told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) that government took the  decision in the best interest of the country and its citizenry and also  to stimulate the economy.
The minister was reacting to claims by opponents of the decision that  government was taking dictation from the Breton Woods institutions on  how to manage the nation’s economy.
He stressed that the Federal Government would not take decisions that  were injurious to Nigerians and reassured that fuel subsidy withdrawal  became necessary to save the nation’s economy from going adrift.
Wogu argued that the subsidy withdrawal policy began 15 years prior  to 2012 under past administrations and that it was time to put the  economy on a straight path.
“Whether our policy is driven by IMF, it is not.
“For the past 15 years, right from the regime of General Ibrahim  Babangida, down to that of General Olusegun Obasanjo, even General  Abdulsalami Abubakar tried it by increasing the pump price of fuel, till  now.
“Every government has tried to do it because of the benefits that  will be derived from it; other countries are equally doing the same; we  are just arriving at the scene quite late.”
Wogu told NAN that African and non-African countries which had toed  the line of subsidy removal in the past currently had very vibrant  economies.
“In the countries that have done it before, who have now come out to be one of the strongest economies in the world, is Brazil.
“Brazil did it and people were agitated that this was not in the best  interest, but with the passage of time, look at what Brazil has turned  into, generating a lot of jobs, creating a lot of rich people, the same  thing will happen in the country.
“And then you can see that because of the global economic issues,  Ghana, for instance, is in the media and has removed subsidies and  they’ve done their own deregulation in the oil and gas subsector.
“The only thing we are asking Nigerians to do is to be patient with  the government so that at the end of the day, we will be able to reap  the benefits of this policy.”
Read More at Nigerian Diary!